On May 5th Kenneth Shared a redacted Immage showing a list of Rumble Creators that he had to disavow in order to welcomed back into the Rumble Community (seen below).

On May 7th, I saved this image from his screen shot that he posted on May 5th.

On that same day Retsnom "claimed" to have the smoking gun to prove Ken's innocense. He claimed to have the original redacted & the original message that had Lumpy's name on it because it was sent to him by Kenneth over the weekend. Below is the image Retsnom shared on his stream & increased the brightness & contrast of to PROVE it was not photoshoped and was real. 

This particular Screenshot can be found at 17:10-18:10 of his stream here (take a screenshot of the stream yourself, zoom in under the "oX" in Lumpy's name and you will see a slightly darker grey line just above "eop" people in the message, over the message bubble.

In this next Image, I questioned Retsnom in dm on Guilded, where he got the original "redacted" iimage from because it did not line up with the one Kenneth posted on May 5th to explain his behavior (seen in the 1st screen shot above). The below image is my questions to Retsnom (I will show this live on request).

Retsnom claimed to have the originals on Sunday (5 May) sent to him by Kenneth himself and that the one I had was not original despite the fact I took it straight from Kenneth's post when I saw it on 7 May. 

I chlallenged Retsnom stating that Kenneth must have shared a fake image on the 7th (turns out the post was made on the 5th) then.

To which Retsnom replied, "But keep in mind that you do not have to use photoshop to move the location of a name. depending on what device, window size, or screen resolution. So the side by side analysis is irrelevant with the exception that the side by side image does not math my original" which has been proven wrong by myself & several other members on X/Twitter (see video below screen shot of dm with Retsnom).

When I told Retsnom that Kenneth either posted a fake redacted image on X, or sent him (Retsnom) a fake image in dm, Retsnom replied with, 

Video

Link:

From here I provided a screenshot of a post made in a discord showing Kenneth's first post on 5 May 11:07 PM (as seen in the screen shot), proving the redacted image that Retsnom claimed to be original was not what Kenneth share on X when started this drama.

To which Retsnom replied, "All I can do is try and seek the truth by giving Kenneth the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise. I agree, it doesn't look good. But he is kind of a retarded spaz at times that knee jerk reacts to things without thinking, if you know him. If it ends up he is guilty or Lumpy is guilty, or some 3rd party is guilty, so be it. But if now one is willing to engage with him to find the truth then everything will be speculation and assumption."

I'll admit is an respectable response but it is also a deflection from asnwering the question (see screenshot of dm from Guilded below).

From here, Retsnom mistook me fore someone else and said, "hey some new info came out really thinking about going live on this but would really like your input before I do. Did you get the data file yet?".

After Retsnom admitted he didn't mean to message me and he would fill me in with more informatoin after he received it (this was on May 8th as see in screenshot above), I've not received a  word from him yet.

But I did ask on 10 May at 10:13pm (see screen shot above and below), "Want to explain to me why the image you used as the "original dm" from lumpy to Ken has artifacts on the message bubble under the "oX" fo Lumpy's name when you swore it wasn't photoshop?" to which I have not received a response yet (see screen shot below).

Now both in Retsnom and by Kenneth's on words, the reason we cannot see the original DM through screen record or otherwise is because Kenneth panicked and blocked Lumpy which caused the DM's to disappear. As Seen below. Blocking an user on X does NOT make a DM disappear. However, a report DOES. This is NOT what Kenneth or Retsnom said he did (see video & screenshoot below).

Screen Shot:

Video:

Link:

Final thing I would like to show that not only did Retsnom have the fake redacted image or the orginal but Kenneth shared the fake image on X on 5 May, but that the one that is "unredacted" showing Lumpy's name as the orignal send of the list is in fact a photoshoped image in of itself. Please see the video in the link below along with corresponding screen shots.

Video:

Link:

Conclusion:

1. Kenneth did infact shared a doctored redacted photo after his post on 5 May got "mass reported and deleted WTF!"
2. The Photo with Lumpy's name on it is in fact photoshoped.
3. Retsnom failed to show actaul proof in his "resolution/screen size arguement."
4. Retsnom failed to show that his "original" unredacted image was not photoshoped.
5. Kenneth is in fact lying about who actually made the list. Whether he is the one who photoshoped the image or not is yet to be seen.
6. Being retarted and panicked is not a valid defense.
7. Lumpy did not send the original list.

What do you guys think? Let me know below.

     Last night I was able to start imaging HIP 78322 (The Blaze Star), also known as T Coronae Borealis. This star is located near the Corona Borealis  at RA 15h 59m 10s Dec 25degress 55m 12s. It is also a Binary Star System of a White Dwarf and a Red Giant.

     The Red Giant has an apparent magnitude (brightness) of 10 (for now). However, the White Dwarf will errupting soon, causing a "nova" to take place. This has the potential the increase the apparent magnitude to 2, making it visible to the naked eye which could lead many people to believe that there is a "new" star in the night sky for only a few days. This is one of only a few star systems that have reouccring "novas" in our galaxy.

     For those who have been following my post on X, Guilded, & Rumble, you know that I am imagining these stars to document this erruption taking place in hopes I can show a before and after. I don't know if it will be a gradual change or a dramatic one (I'm leaning towards dramatic), but that is why I am undertaking this project. To learn so I can understand how our galaxy works.

     Over the next couple of months I will be imaging T Coronae Borealis at least twice a month, and then processing my results. After processing, I will share my results to see if we can notice any changes as time goes on.

     The Blaze Star has the potential of reaching an apparent magnitude of 2, which could have it be as bright as the near by star located inside teh Corona Borealis, Alphecca.

     Below is the current comparison of The Blaze Star to Alphecca. Both images were taking on the same night as a signle shot exposure with no pricessing what so ever. There was some thing cloud cover so this is not the best result. Hopefully as we continue this project, we will have better imaging opprotunties for the before and after images.

     To follow along with my process live on Rumble, head over to AirCondaTv Hobbies and drop a follow.